Search Homes For Sale

Thursday, July 18, 2013

San Clemente Man Tells Council He is New Miramar Owner


Barry Baptiste Tells Council He is New Miramar Owner

Barry Baptiste, of San Clemente, speaks to the City Council on Tuesday about the ownership situation at the Miramar. Baptiste said he and his company have purchased the property from Marc Spizzirri following a lawsuit and the latter man's bankruptcy filing. Photo by Jim Shilander
Barry Baptiste, of San Clemente, speaks to the City Council on Tuesday about the ownership situation at the Miramar. Baptiste said he and his company have purchased the property from Marc Spizzirri following a lawsuit and the latter man’s bankruptcy filing. Photo by Jim Shilander
At the conclusion of a presentation to the City Council on potential redevelopment options for the Miramar Theatre and Bowling Alley, San Clemente resident Barry Baptiste dropped a bombshell on the body. He, not Marc Spizzirri, is now the owner of the Miramar.
Baptiste said as the result of a lawsuit against Spizzirri in 2009, he had been awarded a judgment against a limited liability
company controlled by Spizzirri, which gave him control over 99 percent of its assets, including the Miramar. The other 1 percent is currently held in the name of Spizzirri’s wife, but Baptiste said he expected to be awarded that final percentage next month. Baptiste said he had grown frustrated with Spizzirri appearing before city boards and being referred to in the press as the owner of the Miramar.
After a story in the July 11 issue of the San Clemente Times about a presentation before the Planning Commission, an anonymous letter-writer sent documents to the paper indicating Spizzirri had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. In a phone interview, Spizzirri confirmed that he had indeed filed for bankruptcy and said his ownership status had changed.
Baptiste told the council he was presently working to get caught up on some of the development options for the theater and bowling alley.
After a presentation by design consultant Matt Jennings on potential uses for the Miramar, council members expressed hope that something could be done at the site.
Mayor Bob Baker asked Baptiste to meet with City Manager Pall Gudgeirrsson and other city officials to confirm his new status as owner, and catch up on development options.
Jennings told councilwoman Lori Donchak the cost of refurbishing the facility was “more than likely a couple of million” dollars, but would ultimately depend on what the owner decided to do with the property.

Tuesday, July 9, 2013

Rising prices and falling inventory across the country

Inventories are declining, and prices are rising, according to a recent report from Movoto Real Estate, a brokerage with a presence in 30 U.S. states.

Examining data from Multiple Listing Services in 34 cities across the nation, Movoto found year-over-year declines in June’s inventory in 32 of the 38 cities it tracks. The most drastic declines took place in Sacramento (-54.5 percent), Detroit (-47.1 percent), and Boston (-46.7 percent).

Over the same time period, price per square foot increased in all but two of the cities Movoto observes. The exceptions were New Orleans (-2.2 percent) and Chicago (-3.2 percent). Sacramento topped the list with a 68.1 percent price-per-square-foot increase.

Highlighting just the West Coast, Movoto found a year-over-year decrease in inventory but a month-over-month increase.

A composite of 14 major metros on the West Coast reveals

an 11.9 percent yearly decline in inventory in June, according to Movoto.

In contrast, listings rose month-over-month from 12,218 to 13,698.

West Coast cities with the steepest inventory decreases year-over-year in June were Salem, Oregon (-25.4 percent), Bellevue, Washington (-24.5 percent), and Los Angeles (-24.5 percent).

San Jose, California (19.2 percent), and San Diego, California (3.6 percent) were the only two of the 14 cities in the index to experience rising inventories over the 12-month period.

As inventory declines, price per square foot is on the rise. However, the two cities with growing inventories are not left out of this trend. San Diego and San Jose take the second and third places, respectively, in the ranking of cities by price increase over the year.

Price per square foot increased 20.8 percent in San Diego and 18.4 percent in San Jose.

The only city to beat these two was Los Angeles with a 28.6 percent increase. As of last month, the price per square foot for a home in Los Angeles is $432. This is the second-highest price per square foot on Movoto’s June index for the West Coast.

However, San Francisco outpaced all other cities with a price per square foot of $655.

Prices were also generally up over the month, according to Movoto, rising from $251 per square foot to $253 per square foot.

Friday, July 5, 2013

Mortgage rates recede after dramatic jump

Following last week’s dramatic spike, mortgage rates reversed course this week, according to surveys from Freddie Mac andBankrate.com.

Freddie Mac’s Primary Mortgage Market Survey showed the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage (FRM) averaging 4.29 percent (0.7 point) for the week ending July 3, down from last week’s two-year high of 4.46 percent. Last year at this time, the 30-yearFRM averaged 3.62 percent.

The 15-year FRM averaged 3.39 percent (0.7 percent), down from 3.50 percent the previous weekAdjustable rates, meanwhile, stayed more or less on track. The 5-year Treasury-index hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) averaged 3.10 percent (0.7 point)—up from 3.08 percent—while the 1-year ARM averaged 2.66 percent (0.4 point), unchanged from the last survey.

“Fixed mortgage rates fell over the holiday week as market concerns over the timing of the Federal Reserve’s pullback in bond purchases eased somewhat,” said Frank Nothaft, VP and chief economist for Freddie Mac. “Rates are still low by historical standards and should continue to aid in housing affordability and the ongoing recovery of the housing market.”

Bankrate’s weekly national survey showed similar trends, with the 30-year fixed falling to 4.48 percent and the 15-year fixed dropping to 3.62 percent. Meanwhile, the 5/1 ARM rose to 3.48 percent.

While rates did ease, they’re still a far cry from where they were just two months ago.

“As recently as May 1st, the average 30-year fixed mortgage rate was 3.52 percent. At that time, a $200,000 loan would have carried a monthly payment of $900.32. With the average rate currently at 4.48 percent, the monthly payment for the same size loan would be $1,011, a difference of $111 per month for anyone that waited just a little too long,” Bankrate said in a release.

Thursday, July 4, 2013

Tips To Be A Smart Homebuyer

Back in those olden days (i.e., the 80’s), wise house hunting and smart real estate decision-making required a short list of skills.  

You needed to have an eagle-eye, because there was no web where you could search for homes online. Your agent would look up listings in a big book, or more often you would just drive by a nice-looking home with a for sale sign in front and call the agent up to inquire about it.

You needed to have stamina, because there was no internet which would show you pictures of homes’ interiors - if you wanted to see inside a home, you needed to go inside the home.  

You needed negotiating skills. Then, agents were sought-after more for their home-finding help than for negotiation advice.

You needed a strong sense of your own vision, aesthetics and style. HGTV did not even exist.  Neither did the genre of home design and decor magazines (exception: Architectural Digest, which was not exactly providing affordable or accessible home design tips - then or  now)!

Today, you still need all of these skills. But there’s a short list of additional skills that have been necessitated by the evolution of the real estate and mortgage market. Here is a handful:

1.  Self-control. There’s a lot of hullaballoo about multiple offers, above-asking sales prices and crazy amounts of cash being thrown at sellers, these days. So much, in fact, that some industry observers and participants wonder whether the frenzied market that led to the last market crash might be repeating itself.  

There is evidence that can be cited to bolster arguments in both directions. But one thing all can agree on is this: no one can make anyone spend more on a home than they can afford.  As a home buyer, you must be the ultimate arbiter of what you spend and only you are responsible for controlling yourself to avoid overspending.  Your agent might tell you that you need to go higher for a particular home - and they might be right - but if that “higher” would overextend your personal finances, it’s your responsibility to refuse to go there.  

That might mean you have to rejigger your house hunting price range lower. It might mean you have to compromise on the number of bedrooms or even neighborhood. All of these require that you exercise the skill of self-control. Don’t fight the realities of either the market or your budget. The sooner you accept them and start strategizing around them, the sooner you’ll end up in a home - and the more smart, sound and sustainable your home ownership experience will be.

2.  Math.  You can’t control yourself and your spending without first understanding what you can and cannot afford. Almost every modern house hunter knows that they are supposed to decide for themselves what they can and cannot afford. But in practice, many still view their mortgage qualification limit as the true upper limit on what they can spend for a home.

  • If that is what you’ve been doing, stop it. Get real about flexing some very basic math skills, no matter how much you hated math in school. 
  • Sit down with your spouse, your bills, your bank account statements and maybe even your financial planner or CPA.
  • Get clear on what comes in and goes out every month, and how much cash you can afford to put into your home up front (down payment, closing costs, and move-in expenses) and how much you can afford to spend on housing every month. 
  • Then, take that information to your mortgage professional and ask them to give you some financing scenarios that use what you can afford to back into the corresponding home purchase price range. 
  • Finally, take that to your agent and work with them to use that range to set your home search price range.  If you live in a place where most homes sell for more than asking, find out how much more - then search in a range that much lower than you want to spend, so you can afford to offer enough to be successful.

I find that many folks are simply resistant to doing this math because they don’t like math or are afraid of the truths the math will reveal about what they can (or cannot afford). Others are resistant to having these seemingly dry and difficult conversations. But the willingness to go there is essential to making decisions that will stand you in good stead through a lifetime of home ownership. Stop resisting,  Dive into the discomfort. It’ll be well worth it.

3.  Listening.  So many times, I’ve gotten emails from disgruntled home buyers saying their agent is not listening to them about what they want, and keeps showing them condos when they really want a single family home, showing them 2 bedroom homes when they want 4.

On the other hand, I also get notes from disgruntled home buyers saying their agent is not listening to them when they say what they can afford to spend, and keeps showing them homes priced beyond that range. 

Here’s what I think is happening: many buyers know their budget, but fight the reality of what that translates to in terms of what kind of home can be had for that money in their area. So, agents are forced to either: (a) show you a home you can afford within the range you’ve given them, which will fall short of your wish list, or (b) show you a home that checks the boxes on your wish list that is more expensive than what you’ve said you want to spend.

There is a third thing that can happen here, though.  You can listen.  Most agents won’t do either (a) or (b) above without telling you that the property reflects a compromise in specifications or in price. But you must be able to hear that over the hum of your wishes and dreams, or you will be perpetually disgruntled and frustrated in your house hunt.

And that’s not all you have to listen to - smart buyers listen to the numbers, listen to the market data, listen to the feedback inherent in unsuccessful offers, listen to their spouse or other partner(s) in co-buying, and listen to their children or other roommates-to-be in the property.  Successful buyers listen to the seller’s wants, needs and priorities and factor them into the mix, too. Listening doesn’t mean you have to cave or capitulate to what someone else wants, or even that you have to prioritize it over your own wishes. But it does mean that you respectfully process the other perspective, consider it and course-correct, if sensible. (Or not, if not.)  

4.  Discernment.   We live in a world of noise, for better or for worse. The noise of TV commentators hollering about what we can and cannot afford, while still other TV commentators noisily discuss home features and lifestyles with no regard to their monetary implications for real-life home owners. There’s the noise of news about the economy, the noise of our friends’ and parents’ opinions, the noise of our own inner fantasies that life will finally be perfect if we can just live in that style of house, or on that street, or in that subdivision, or with a house full of that furniture. 

Discernment is the skill of picking out what is useful, wise, right and important and being able to discard or disregard the rest of the noise. Doing your own math, creating your own vision of life in your eventual home and listening to only the wise counsel of those you know to have your best interests at heart are all discernment tactics. You might need to exercise vigilance against allowing the noise to spark panic, fear, paralysis or even over-optimism, over-confidence and over-spending. 

Wednesday, July 3, 2013

Home prices increasing

Forty-five of the top 50 metropolitan markets will experience yearly price increases during the second half of the year, according to Clear Capital’s Home Data Index Market Reportreleased Tuesday.

This widespread forecast of price increases “speaks to this move toward a more balanced, broad-based recovery,” said Alex Villacorta, VP of research and analytics at Clear Capital.

Bakersfield, California, is expected to lead national price gains with a 5.2 percent price increase through the end of this year.

Las Vegas comes in as a close second in Clear Capital’s forecast with a projected price growth of 5 percent. Las Vegas posted the highest quarterly price gain in the second quarter—an increase of 4.4 percent.

The Bakersfield metro posted a notable jump from 29th place in Clear Capital’s first-quarter report to first place in the second quarter report.

“This leap is an example of the fundamentals driving the overall recovery, Clear Capital said, adding also that Bakersfield “serves as a reminder that the recovery continues to unfold market by market.”

After, Bakersfield and Las Vegas, the top five metros for projected price gains through the end of the year are rounded out by Chicago; Sacramento, California; and Milwaukee, Wisconsin, with gains of 4.9 percent, 4.8 percent, and 4.4 percent, respectively.

Clear Capital expects the Cleveland metro to fare the worst for the remainder of the year with a 2.2 percent price decline.

Raleigh, North Carolina; Charlotte, North Carolina; and Denver, Colorado, are the only other metros out of the top 50 with anticipated price depreciations over the remainder of the year, according to Clear Capital. However, the analytics firm expects price decreases of less than 0.5 percent in each.

“At the metro level, we saw some subtle, yet notable trends unfold in June,” Villacorta said. “While price trends continued to diverge at the micro market level, they are for the most part positive.

At a national level, Clear Capital revised its 2.6 percent projected price gain over the year this year up to 6 percent. While lower than the current yearly gain of 8.6 percent, this forecast is still greater than historical norms, which rank between 4 and 5 percent.

While it is notable that some markets are experiencing double-digit gains, “[s]eeing the bulk of major metros move into positive territory is truly good news, even if their gains are still in the single digits,” Villacorta said.